RYAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koppers Holdings has a net margin of -3.84% compared to Rayonier Advanced Materials's net margin of -2.14%. Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27% beat Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 97.84%. On the other hand Koppers Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $59.50 which suggests that it could grow by 113.34%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Rayonier Advanced Materials, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Rayonier Advanced Materials.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, which suggesting that the stock is 201.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.745, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.508%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koppers Holdings offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings pays out 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are $422.5M, which are smaller than Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues of $477M. Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M is lower than Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Rayonier Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Koppers Holdings's PE ratio is 11.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayonier Advanced Materials is 0.23x versus 0.28x for Koppers Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of -3.84% compared to Rayonier Advanced Materials's net margin of 3.19%. Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.36%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 97.84%. On the other hand Quaker Houghton has an analysts' consensus of $175.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.44%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, which suggesting that the stock is 201.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.612%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quaker Houghton offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are $422.5M, which are smaller than Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues of $444.1M. Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M is lower than Quaker Houghton's net income of $14.2M. Notably, Rayonier Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quaker Houghton's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayonier Advanced Materials is 0.23x versus 1.22x for Quaker Houghton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of -3.84% compared to Rayonier Advanced Materials's net margin of 10.42%. Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27% beat Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 97.84%. On the other hand Minerals Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $101.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.78%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, which suggesting that the stock is 201.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.776%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Minerals Technologies offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are $422.5M, which are smaller than Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues of $518.1M. Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M is lower than Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M. Notably, Rayonier Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Minerals Technologies's PE ratio is 12.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayonier Advanced Materials is 0.23x versus 0.97x for Minerals Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -3.84% compared to Rayonier Advanced Materials's net margin of --. Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 97.84%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 272.34%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Rayonier Advanced Materials, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Rayonier Advanced Materials.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, which suggesting that the stock is 201.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues are $422.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Rayonier Advanced Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayonier Advanced Materials is 0.23x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.