KOP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of 7.16%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.81%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.67 which suggests that it could grow by 53.88%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.502, which suggesting that the stock is 50.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.662%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 5.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.25x versus 0.70x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.81%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 257.97%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.502, which suggesting that the stock is 50.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.25x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -3.84%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.81%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.56%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Rayonier Advanced Materials, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Rayonier Advanced Materials.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.502, which suggesting that the stock is 50.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 2.861, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.088%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $422.5M. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.25x versus 0.19x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.81%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 146.83%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.502, which suggesting that the stock is 50.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.25x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.