CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -10.34%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.5%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.37x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.87x versus 0.26x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 0.93%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.28%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.517%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.37x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.87x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 4.06%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.82%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Nucor.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.37x while Nucor's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.87x versus 1.03x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.22%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.37x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.87x versus 1.10x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.