STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 7.16%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $145.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.143%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is higher than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.10x versus 0.87x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of -10.34%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $145.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.5%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.10x versus 0.26x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of -9.2%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 3.18%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $145.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $58.21 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.765%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of -$175.7M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 41.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.10x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 4.06%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $145.70, signalling upside risk potential of 18.22%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.82%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Nucor.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.49%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Nucor's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.10x versus 1.03x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.