KWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 7% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of -0.63%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.81% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $185.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.36%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $32.3M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 12.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus 0.21x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innospec has a net margin of 7% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 7.53%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.81% beat Innospec's return on equity of 12.17%.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $185.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.36%. On the other hand Innospec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.55%. Given that Quaker Houghton has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Quaker Houghton is more attractive than Innospec.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.261%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Innospec offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec pays out 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Innospec quarterly revenues of $443.4M. Quaker Houghton's net income of $32.3M is lower than Innospec's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Innospec's PE ratio is 19.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus 1.49x for Innospec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.81% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $185.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.36%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 227.87%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $32.3M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of --. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.81% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $185.50, signalling upside risk potential of 40.36%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.48%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.951% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Quaker Houghton has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quaker Houghton pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues are $462.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Quaker Houghton's net income of $32.3M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Quaker Houghton's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.38x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quaker Houghton is 1.27x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.