MTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of 3.19%. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.36%.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.78%. On the other hand Quaker Houghton has an analysts' consensus of $175.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.44%. Given that Minerals Technologies has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe Minerals Technologies is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.776% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.612%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Quaker Houghton offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $518.1M, which are larger than Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues of $444.1M. Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M is higher than Quaker Houghton's net income of $14.2M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Quaker Houghton's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 0.97x versus 1.22x for Quaker Houghton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of --. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.78%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 272.34%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.776% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $518.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 0.97x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of -3.84%. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27%.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.78%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 97.84%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.776% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.57%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $518.1M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $422.5M. Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 0.97x versus 0.23x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 10.42% compared to Minerals Technologies's net margin of --. Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $101.00, signalling upside risk potential of 58.78%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.92%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.776% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

Minerals Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Minerals Technologies pays 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues are $518.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Minerals Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.26x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Minerals Technologies is 0.97x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.