Financhill
Sell
30

CC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$14.20
Seasonality move :
9.43%
Day range:
$14.09 - $14.59
52-week range:
$13.09 - $29.21
Dividend yield:
7.07%
P/E ratio:
25.27x
P/S ratio:
0.37x
P/B ratio:
3.50x
Volume:
1.8M
Avg. volume:
3.6M
1-year change:
-50.12%
Market cap:
$2.1B
Revenue:
$5.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CC
The Chemours
$1.4B $0.16 0.26% -37.88% $22.20
HUN
Huntsman
$1.4B -$0.10 2.75% -65.45% $20.15
KWR
Quaker Houghton
$430.5M $1.52 -3.15% -13.33% $175.00
MTX
Minerals Technologies
$522.9M $1.39 -6.08% -7.99% $101.00
NGVT
Ingevity
$297.4M $0.31 -12.24% 27.9% $58.50
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
$418.5M -$0.19 -3.06% -333.35% $11.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CC
The Chemours
$14.15 $22.20 $2.1B 25.27x $0.25 7.07% 0.37x
HUN
Huntsman
$16.12 $20.15 $2.8B -- $0.25 6.2% 0.46x
KWR
Quaker Houghton
$131.97 $175.00 $2.3B 20.30x $0.49 1.43% 1.28x
MTX
Minerals Technologies
$65.13 $101.00 $2.1B 12.55x $0.11 0.65% 0.99x
NGVT
Ingevity
$43.07 $58.50 $1.6B -- $0.00 0% 1.11x
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
$5.68 $11.00 $374.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.23x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CC
The Chemours
87.18% 2.632 162.61% 0.82x
HUN
Huntsman
38.28% 0.359 55.48% 0.68x
KWR
Quaker Houghton
34.32% 1.075 28.76% 1.55x
MTX
Minerals Technologies
35.73% 1.775 39.37% 1.82x
NGVT
Ingevity
87.77% 0.312 94.58% 0.91x
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
50.55% 4.733 131.56% 0.85x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CC
The Chemours
$273M $75M 1.84% 12.49% 5.45% $29M
HUN
Huntsman
$188M -$56M -3.62% -5.65% -4.27% $102M
KWR
Quaker Houghton
$156.2M $30.7M 5.46% 8.36% 6.32% $40.6M
MTX
Minerals Technologies
$132.7M $74.2M 6.16% 9.71% 15.83% $42.3M
NGVT
Ingevity
$101.9M $55.2M -23.24% -113.59% 11.48% $39.6M
RYAM
Rayonier Advanced Materials
$36.9M $7.3M -2.59% -5.27% 1.04% $26.6M

The Chemours vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CC or HUN?

    Huntsman has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of -9.71%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    HUN
    Huntsman
    12.95% -$0.82 $5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or HUN?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 56.89%. On the other hand Huntsman has an analysts' consensus of $20.15 which suggests that it could grow by 25.02%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Huntsman.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    2 6 0
    HUN
    Huntsman
    3 10 0
  • Is CC or HUN More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.997, which suggesting that the stock is 99.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntsman has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.436%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or HUN?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Huntsman offers a yield of 6.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntsman pays out -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or HUN?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Huntsman quarterly revenues of $1.5B. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is higher than Huntsman's net income of -$141M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Huntsman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.37x versus 0.46x for Huntsman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.37x 25.27x $1.4B -$8M
    HUN
    Huntsman
    0.46x -- $1.5B -$141M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or KWR?

    Quaker Houghton has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of 3.19%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 8.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    KWR
    Quaker Houghton
    35.17% $0.80 $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or KWR?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 56.89%. On the other hand Quaker Houghton has an analysts' consensus of $175.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.61%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Quaker Houghton, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Quaker Houghton.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    2 6 0
    KWR
    Quaker Houghton
    2 2 0
  • Is CC or KWR More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.997, which suggesting that the stock is 99.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.612%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or KWR?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Quaker Houghton offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 28.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Quaker Houghton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Chemours's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or KWR?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Quaker Houghton quarterly revenues of $444.1M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is lower than Quaker Houghton's net income of $14.2M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Quaker Houghton's PE ratio is 20.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.37x versus 1.28x for Quaker Houghton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.37x 25.27x $1.4B -$8M
    KWR
    Quaker Houghton
    1.28x 20.30x $444.1M $14.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or MTX?

    Minerals Technologies has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of 10.42%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Minerals Technologies's return on equity of 9.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    MTX
    Minerals Technologies
    25.61% $1.69 $2.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or MTX?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 56.89%. On the other hand Minerals Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $101.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.08%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Minerals Technologies, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Minerals Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    2 6 0
    MTX
    Minerals Technologies
    2 0 0
  • Is CC or MTX More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.997, which suggesting that the stock is 99.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.776%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or MTX?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Minerals Technologies offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out 7.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Minerals Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Chemours's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or MTX?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Minerals Technologies quarterly revenues of $518.1M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is lower than Minerals Technologies's net income of $54M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Minerals Technologies's PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.37x versus 0.99x for Minerals Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.37x 25.27x $1.4B -$8M
    MTX
    Minerals Technologies
    0.99x 12.55x $518.1M $54M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or NGVT?

    Ingevity has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of 5.56%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    NGVT
    Ingevity
    34.1% $0.46 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or NGVT?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 56.89%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $58.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.83%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Ingevity.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    2 6 0
    NGVT
    Ingevity
    1 1 0
  • Is CC or NGVT More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.997, which suggesting that the stock is 99.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.553%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or NGVT?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or NGVT?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $298.8M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is lower than Ingevity's net income of $16.6M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.37x versus 1.11x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.37x 25.27x $1.4B -$8M
    NGVT
    Ingevity
    1.11x -- $298.8M $16.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CC or RYAM?

    Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of -0.57% compared to The Chemours's net margin of -3.84%. The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CC
    The Chemours
    19.58% -$0.06 $4.7B
    RYAM
    Rayonier Advanced Materials
    8.74% -$0.25 $1.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CC or RYAM?

    The Chemours has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 56.89%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 93.66%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than The Chemours.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CC
    The Chemours
    2 6 0
    RYAM
    Rayonier Advanced Materials
    0 0 0
  • Is CC or RYAM More Risky?

    The Chemours has a beta of 1.997, which suggesting that the stock is 99.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.57%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CC or RYAM?

    The Chemours has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Chemours pays 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CC or RYAM?

    The Chemours quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $422.5M. The Chemours's net income of -$8M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, The Chemours's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.27x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Chemours is 0.37x versus 0.23x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CC
    The Chemours
    0.37x 25.27x $1.4B -$8M
    RYAM
    Rayonier Advanced Materials
    0.23x -- $422.5M -$16.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

What Is Hindsight Bias In Investing?
What Is Hindsight Bias In Investing?

You’ve probably heard the expression “hindsight is 20/20.” That saying…

Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?
Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) had an initial IPO of close to…

Will Chevron Acquire Hess?
Will Chevron Acquire Hess?

Long-time Buffett favorite in the energy sector Chevron (NYSE:CVX) is…

Stock Ideas

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
29
UNF alert for Mar 26

UniFirst [UNF] is up 1.53% over the past day.

Sell
30
KEQU alert for Mar 26

Kewaunee Scientific [KEQU] is down 2.64% over the past day.

Buy
82
EPAC alert for Mar 26

Enerpac Tool Group [EPAC] is down 0.66% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock