HUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chemours has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -0.57%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.66%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 64.08%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.857%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. The Chemours offers a yield of 7.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$8M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chemours's PE ratio is 24.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.45x versus 0.35x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -1.23%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.66%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.042%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.45x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of --. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.66%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 278.38%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.45x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of --. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.66%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 144.9%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.45x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.