BQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of 3.35%. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27721.12%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.86%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cango has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of 8.37%. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat Cango's return on equity of 7.6%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27721.12%. On the other hand Cango has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -21.39%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Cango.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.913%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cango pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cango quarterly revenues of $92.8M. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than Cango's net income of $7.8M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cango's PE ratio is 8.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 3.54x for Cango. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of --. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27721.12%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1212.88%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than MOGU, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than MOGU.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.341, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.939%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 0.99x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of -36.2%. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27721.12%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.23 which suggests that it could grow by 37.3%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than NIO.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.737, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.73%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 0.85x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.