BZUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H World Group has a net margin of 0% compared to Baozun's net margin of 0.81%. Baozun's return on equity of -3.18% beat H World Group's return on equity of 24.59%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.97, signalling upside risk potential of 74.89%. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.64 which suggests that it could grow by 37.79%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than H World Group.

Baozun has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.938%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Baozun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $416.2M, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $837.1M. Baozun's net income of $17.9K is lower than H World Group's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H World Group's PE ratio is 24.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.10x versus 3.16x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 0% compared to Baozun's net margin of -36.2%. Baozun's return on equity of -3.18% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.97, signalling upside risk potential of 74.89%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.60 which suggests that it could grow by 59.21%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than NIO.

Baozun has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.737, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.73%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $416.2M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Baozun's net income of $17.9K is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.10x versus 0.79x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Niu Technologies has a net margin of 0% compared to Baozun's net margin of -8.86%. Baozun's return on equity of -3.18% beat Niu Technologies's return on equity of -18.93%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.97, signalling upside risk potential of 74.89%. On the other hand Niu Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 63.12%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than Niu Technologies, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than Niu Technologies.

Baozun has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.006%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Niu Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Niu Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $416.2M, which are larger than Niu Technologies quarterly revenues of $113.9M. Baozun's net income of $17.9K is higher than Niu Technologies's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Niu Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.10x versus 0.48x for Niu Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 0% compared to Baozun's net margin of -8.26%. Baozun's return on equity of -3.18% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.97, signalling upside risk potential of 74.89%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.34 which suggests that it could grow by 21.68%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than XPeng.

Baozun has a beta of 0.390, which suggesting that the stock is 60.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $416.2M, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Baozun's net income of $17.9K is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.10x versus 3.32x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.