HTHT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JD.com has a net margin of 19.76% compared to H World Group's net margin of 4.51%. H World Group's return on equity of 29.15% beat JD.com's return on equity of 11.87%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $44.56, signalling upside risk potential of 31.01%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $48.76 which suggests that it could grow by 34.96%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than H World Group.

H World Group has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.621%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. JD.com offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. H World Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $899.7M, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $36.4B. H World Group's net income of $177.8M is lower than JD.com's net income of $1.6B. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.86x while JD.com's PE ratio is 11.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.44x versus 0.36x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto has a net margin of 19.76% compared to H World Group's net margin of 6.56%. H World Group's return on equity of 29.15% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 16.5%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $44.56, signalling upside risk potential of 31.01%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $29.96 which suggests that it could grow by 18.31%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Li Auto.

H World Group has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H World Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $899.7M, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6B. H World Group's net income of $177.8M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $393.1M. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.86x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 18.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.44x versus 1.36x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Niu Technologies has a net margin of 19.76% compared to H World Group's net margin of -4%. H World Group's return on equity of 29.15% beat Niu Technologies's return on equity of -23.25%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $44.56, signalling upside risk potential of 31.01%. On the other hand Niu Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.9%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Niu Technologies, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Niu Technologies.

H World Group has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Niu Technologies has a beta of 0.458, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.23%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Niu Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H World Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Niu Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $899.7M, which are larger than Niu Technologies quarterly revenues of $143M. H World Group's net income of $177.8M is higher than Niu Technologies's net income of -$5.7M. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.86x while Niu Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.44x versus 0.36x for Niu Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum China Holdings has a net margin of 19.76% compared to H World Group's net margin of 9.67%. H World Group's return on equity of 29.15% beat Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.07%.

H World Group has a consensus price target of $44.56, signalling upside risk potential of 31.01%. On the other hand Yum China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $56.89 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

H World Group has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.675%.

H World Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Yum China Holdings offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. H World Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings pays out 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H World Group quarterly revenues are $899.7M, which are smaller than Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.1B. H World Group's net income of $177.8M is lower than Yum China Holdings's net income of $297M. Notably, H World Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.86x while Yum China Holdings's PE ratio is 22.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H World Group is 3.44x versus 1.77x for Yum China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.