Financhill
Buy
60

TCOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$63.18
Seasonality move :
9.93%
Day range:
$62.47 - $64.14
52-week range:
$38.23 - $77.18
Dividend yield:
0.48%
P/E ratio:
18.14x
P/S ratio:
5.83x
P/B ratio:
2.12x
Volume:
2.7M
Avg. volume:
5.2M
1-year change:
34.52%
Market cap:
$41.1B
Revenue:
$7.4B
EPS (TTM):
$3.48

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
TCOM
Trip.com Group
$1.9B $0.76 14.53% -14.2% $74.39
BQ
Boqii Holding
-- -- -- -- --
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
-- -- -- -- --
JD
JD.com
$39.9B $0.96 9.77% 52.1% $54.99
XPEV
XPeng
$2.2B -$0.21 119.4% -2.47% $24.15
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
$3.1B $0.79 6.07% 11.92% $59.52
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
TCOM
Trip.com Group
$63.17 $74.39 $41.1B 18.14x $0.30 0.48% 5.83x
BQ
Boqii Holding
$2.12 -- $2.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.02x
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
$4.17 -- $125.8M 4.21x $0.80 0% 0.19x
JD
JD.com
$41.32 $54.99 $60B 11.03x $0.76 1.84% 0.39x
XPEV
XPeng
$20.96 $24.15 $19.9B -- $0.00 0% 3.48x
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
$52.95 $59.52 $19.8B 22.73x $0.24 1.36% 1.83x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
TCOM
Trip.com Group
21.82% -0.435 12.09% 1.24x
BQ
Boqii Holding
20.86% 3.319 94.88% 2.05x
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
30.41% 0.395 94.52% 0.95x
JD
JD.com
21.11% 0.190 14.51% 0.88x
XPEV
XPeng
27.95% 0.560 14.82% 0.94x
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
2.17% 0.167 0.88% 0.95x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
TCOM
Trip.com Group
$1.4B $319.8M 9.43% 12.79% 21.04% $325.8M
BQ
Boqii Holding
-- -- -17.81% -25.13% -- --
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
$26.4M $11.1M 6.16% 8.37% 7.42% -$892K
JD
JD.com
$7.4B $1.3B 11.67% 13.91% 3.61% $3.5B
XPEV
XPeng
$323.1M -$244.7M -12.5% -17.11% -7.8% -$1.2B
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
$356M $168M 13.19% 13.66% 6.47% -$15M

Trip.com Group vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns TCOM or BQ?

    Boqii Holding has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of --. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    79.28% $0.43 $25B
    BQ
    Boqii Holding
    -- -- $44.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About TCOM or BQ?

    Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $74.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.77%. On the other hand Boqii Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27721.12%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    23 2 0
    BQ
    Boqii Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is TCOM or BQ More Risky?

    Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TCOM or BQ?

    Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Boqii Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boqii Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TCOM or BQ?

    Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Boqii Holding quarterly revenues of --. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than Boqii Holding's net income of --. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.14x while Boqii Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.83x versus 0.02x for Boqii Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    5.83x 18.14x $1.8B $299.8M
    BQ
    Boqii Holding
    0.02x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns TCOM or CAAS?

    China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of 3.35%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    79.28% $0.43 $25B
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    16.05% $0.18 $542.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About TCOM or CAAS?

    Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $74.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.77%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.86%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    23 2 0
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is TCOM or CAAS More Risky?

    Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TCOM or CAAS?

    Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TCOM or CAAS?

    Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.14x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.83x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    5.83x 18.14x $1.8B $299.8M
    CAAS
    China Automotive Systems
    0.19x 4.21x $164.2M $5.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns TCOM or JD?

    JD.com has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of 2.84%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat JD.com's return on equity of 13.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    79.28% $0.43 $25B
    JD
    JD.com
    15.31% $0.90 $51.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About TCOM or JD?

    Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $74.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.77%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $54.99 which suggests that it could grow by 33.09%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    23 2 0
    JD
    JD.com
    27 3 0
  • Is TCOM or JD More Risky?

    Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.465%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TCOM or JD?

    Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. JD.com offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TCOM or JD?

    Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is lower than JD.com's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.14x while JD.com's PE ratio is 11.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.83x versus 0.39x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    5.83x 18.14x $1.8B $299.8M
    JD
    JD.com
    0.39x 11.03x $48.2B $1.4B
  • Which has Higher Returns TCOM or XPEV?

    XPeng has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of -8.26%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    79.28% $0.43 $25B
    XPEV
    XPeng
    14.44% -$0.19 $5.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About TCOM or XPEV?

    Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $74.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.77%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.15 which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than XPeng.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    23 2 0
    XPEV
    XPeng
    14 7 0
  • Is TCOM or XPEV More Risky?

    Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TCOM or XPEV?

    Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TCOM or XPEV?

    Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.14x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.83x versus 3.48x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    5.83x 18.14x $1.8B $299.8M
    XPEV
    XPeng
    3.48x -- $2.2B -$184.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns TCOM or YUMC?

    Yum China Holdings has a net margin of 16.93% compared to Trip.com Group's net margin of 4.43%. Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.79% beat Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    79.28% $0.43 $25B
    YUMC
    Yum China Holdings
    13.72% $0.30 $6.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About TCOM or YUMC?

    Trip.com Group has a consensus price target of $74.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.77%. On the other hand Yum China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $59.52 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    23 2 0
    YUMC
    Yum China Holdings
    17 1 0
  • Is TCOM or YUMC More Risky?

    Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.119, which suggesting that the stock is 88.112% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.542%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TCOM or YUMC?

    Trip.com Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Yum China Holdings offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Trip.com Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TCOM or YUMC?

    Trip.com Group quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Trip.com Group's net income of $299.8M is higher than Yum China Holdings's net income of $115M. Notably, Trip.com Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.14x while Yum China Holdings's PE ratio is 22.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trip.com Group is 5.83x versus 1.83x for Yum China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TCOM
    Trip.com Group
    5.83x 18.14x $1.8B $299.8M
    YUMC
    Yum China Holdings
    1.83x 22.73x $2.6B $115M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Nu Holdings Stock Be in 2030?
Where Will Nu Holdings Stock Be in 2030?

Despite fast growth, high profitability and an extraordinary runway ahead,…

Is it Too Late to Buy United Airlines Stock?
Is it Too Late to Buy United Airlines Stock?

United Airlines (NASDAQ:UAL) has thoroughly outpaced the broader stock market…

3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

When the market entered a correction in February and March,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
78
GATE alert for Apr 2

Marblegate Acquisition [GATE] is up 86.64% over the past day.

Buy
52
NUTX alert for Apr 2

Nutex Health [NUTX] is down 0.56% over the past day.

Buy
75
CORT alert for Apr 2

Corcept Therapeutics [CORT] is down 7.69% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock