CAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 10.97%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.6%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.44%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Dorman Products.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, which suggesting that the stock is 133.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.519%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 21.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.20x versus 2.08x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of --. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.6%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, which suggesting that the stock is 133.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.20x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of -13.73%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.6%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 443.01%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, which suggesting that the stock is 133.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.749%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 57.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.20x versus 0.59x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 1.87%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Monro's return on equity of 4.12%.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.6%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $29.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Monro.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, which suggesting that the stock is 133.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.677%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Automotive Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $301.4M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is lower than Monro's net income of $5.6M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Monro's PE ratio is 28.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.20x versus 0.65x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.