NIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -36.2% compared to NIO's net margin of 7.96%. NIO's return on equity of -120.71% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.36%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 24.45%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.17 which suggests that it could grow by 41.28%. Given that Li Auto has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Li Auto is more attractive than NIO.

NIO has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6.2B. NIO's net income of -$991.2M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $489.6M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 22.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 1.24x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -36.2% compared to NIO's net margin of 2.12%. NIO's return on equity of -120.71% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 24.45%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.42 which suggests that it could grow by 1.57%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Tesla.

NIO has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. NIO's net income of -$991.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 156.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 10.44x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of -36.2% compared to NIO's net margin of -8.26%. NIO's return on equity of -120.71% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 24.45%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.30 which suggests that it could grow by 21.03%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than XPeng.

NIO has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. NIO's net income of -$991.2M is lower than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 3.34x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -36.2% compared to NIO's net margin of -4.36%. NIO's return on equity of -120.71% beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

NIO has a consensus price target of $5.02, signalling upside risk potential of 24.45%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $39.30 which suggests that it could grow by 87.14%. Given that ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding is more attractive than NIO.

NIO has a beta of 1.737, which suggesting that the stock is 73.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $3.2B. NIO's net income of -$991.2M is lower than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$138M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 0.49x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.