NIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -27.53% compared to NIO's net margin of 6.56%. NIO's return on equity of -98.45% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 16.5%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $6.32, signalling upside risk potential of 39.31%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $29.96 which suggests that it could grow by 27.14%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Li Auto.

NIO has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6B. NIO's net income of -$718.1M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $393.1M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 1.02x versus 1.27x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -27.53% compared to NIO's net margin of 8.61%. NIO's return on equity of -98.45% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $6.32, signalling upside risk potential of 39.31%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Tesla.

NIO has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. NIO's net income of -$718.1M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 1.02x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of -27.53% compared to NIO's net margin of -17.9%. NIO's return on equity of -98.45% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.41%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $6.32, signalling upside risk potential of 39.31%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $14.36 which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than XPeng.

NIO has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $1.4B. NIO's net income of -$718.1M is lower than XPeng's net income of -$252.5M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 1.02x versus 2.24x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -27.53% compared to NIO's net margin of -6.68%. NIO's return on equity of -98.45% beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

NIO has a consensus price target of $6.32, signalling upside risk potential of 39.31%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $34.69 which suggests that it could grow by 25.9%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding.

NIO has a beta of 1.769, which suggesting that the stock is 76.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $2.6B. NIO's net income of -$718.1M is lower than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$171.3M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 1.02x versus 0.70x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.