NIU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -8.86% compared to Niu Technologies's net margin of 7.96%. Niu Technologies's return on equity of -18.93% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.36%.

Niu Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.32%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.11 which suggests that it could grow by 45.69%. Given that Niu Technologies has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe Niu Technologies is more attractive than Li Auto.

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 101.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Niu Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niu Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Niu Technologies quarterly revenues are $113.9M, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Niu Technologies's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $489.6M. Notably, Niu Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niu Technologies is 0.50x versus 1.20x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lotus Technology has a net margin of -8.86% compared to Niu Technologies's net margin of -80.8%. Niu Technologies's return on equity of -18.93% beat Lotus Technology's return on equity of --.

Niu Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.32%. On the other hand Lotus Technology has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 212.5%. Given that Lotus Technology has higher upside potential than Niu Technologies, analysts believe Lotus Technology is more attractive than Niu Technologies.

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 101.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lotus Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Niu Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lotus Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niu Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lotus Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Niu Technologies quarterly revenues are $113.9M, which are smaller than Lotus Technology quarterly revenues of $254.7M. Niu Technologies's net income of -$10.1M is higher than Lotus Technology's net income of -$205.8M. Notably, Niu Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lotus Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niu Technologies is 0.50x versus 0.82x for Lotus Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -8.86% compared to Niu Technologies's net margin of -36.2%. Niu Technologies's return on equity of -18.93% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

Niu Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.32%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.08 which suggests that it could grow by 44.27%. Given that Niu Technologies has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Niu Technologies is more attractive than NIO.

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 101.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.737, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.73%.

Niu Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niu Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Niu Technologies quarterly revenues are $113.9M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Niu Technologies's net income of -$10.1M is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, Niu Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niu Technologies is 0.50x versus 0.79x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of -8.86% compared to Niu Technologies's net margin of -8.26%. Niu Technologies's return on equity of -18.93% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

Niu Technologies has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.32%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.60 which suggests that it could grow by 33.19%. Given that Niu Technologies has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Niu Technologies is more attractive than XPeng.

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.010, which suggesting that the stock is 101.006% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Niu Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niu Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Niu Technologies quarterly revenues are $113.9M, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Niu Technologies's net income of -$10.1M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, Niu Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niu Technologies is 0.50x versus 3.11x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.