CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baozun has a net margin of -- compared to Cango's net margin of -4.28%. Cango's return on equity of 3.59% beat Baozun's return on equity of -4%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.6%. On the other hand Baozun has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.6%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baozun has a beta of 0.323, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.666%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baozun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baozun pays out -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Baozun quarterly revenues of $287.3M. Cango's net income of $9.5M is higher than Baozun's net income of -$12.3M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.64x while Baozun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 12.82x versus 0.14x for Baozun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of -- compared to Cango's net margin of --. Cango's return on equity of 3.59% beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.6%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1124.25%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.630, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.015%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are larger than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Cango's net income of $9.5M is higher than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.64x while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 12.82x versus 1.07x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -- compared to Cango's net margin of 23.9%. Cango's return on equity of 3.59% beat Tuniu's return on equity of -2.93%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.6%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 139.96%. Given that Tuniu has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Tuniu is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.678, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.838%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $26M. Cango's net income of $9.5M is higher than Tuniu's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.64x while Tuniu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 12.82x versus 1.72x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uxin has a net margin of -- compared to Cango's net margin of -12.24%. Cango's return on equity of 3.59% beat Uxin's return on equity of --.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.6%. On the other hand Uxin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 996.37%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.753%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uxin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $3.8M, which are smaller than Uxin quarterly revenues of $69.4M. Cango's net income of $9.5M is higher than Uxin's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.64x while Uxin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 12.82x versus 2.57x for Uxin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.