LMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.61%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $544.62, signalling upside risk potential of 16.83%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 10.16%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.395%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18.6B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.57x versus 1.53x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 4.1%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $544.62, signalling upside risk potential of 16.83%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $198.34 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.486, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.429%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18.6B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $3B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 14.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.57x versus 0.67x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.2%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $544.62, signalling upside risk potential of 16.83%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $257.58 which suggests that it could grow by 22.04%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.218%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18.6B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.57x versus 1.89x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 6.85%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $544.62, signalling upside risk potential of 16.83%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $142.23 which suggests that it could grow by 9.42%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.807% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.687%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. RTX offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18.6B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.57x versus 2.16x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.