HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.56%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $289.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.4%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $277.35 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.236%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.75x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.64x versus 1.92x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 9.49%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $289.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.4%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $595.55 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.55%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.75x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 17.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.64x versus 1.65x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 10.26%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 16.05%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $289.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.4%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $560.36 which suggests that it could grow by 19.94%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.598%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 54.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $10B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $1B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.75x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 28.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.64x versus 1.69x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.33%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $289.74, signalling upside risk potential of 19.4%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.51 which suggests that it could grow by 16.18%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than RTX.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.71% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.125%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. RTX offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.75x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.64x versus 1.98x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.