NOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equifax has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 9.23%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat Equifax's return on equity of 12.43%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $541.79, signalling upside risk potential of 14.5%. On the other hand Equifax has an analysts' consensus of $278.94 which suggests that it could grow by 8.54%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Equifax, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Equifax.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equifax has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.222%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Equifax offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Equifax pays out 31.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Equifax quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than Equifax's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Equifax's PE ratio is 52.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.71x versus 5.59x for Equifax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of -23.14%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -60.54%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $541.79, signalling upside risk potential of 14.5%. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 191.97%. Given that Iveda Solutions has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe Iveda Solutions is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.004%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$555K. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.71x versus 1.00x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 24.38%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 28.2%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $541.79, signalling upside risk potential of 14.5%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $27.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.88%. Given that NAPCO Security Technologies has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.279%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.9M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 17.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.71x versus 4.55x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of 5.08% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of -16.92%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 25.23% beat Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -26.44%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $541.79, signalling upside risk potential of 14.5%. On the other hand Universal Security Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.51% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.351, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.945%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Universal Security Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Security Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $9.5B, which are larger than Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $481M is higher than Universal Security Instruments's net income of -$936.6K. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Universal Security Instruments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.71x versus 0.23x for Universal Security Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.