NOC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Iveda Solutions has a net margin of 10.26% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of -23.14%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 16.05% beat Iveda Solutions's return on equity of -60.54%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $560.36, signalling upside risk potential of 19.34%. On the other hand Iveda Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 171.19%. Given that Iveda Solutions has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe Iveda Solutions is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iveda Solutions has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.23%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Iveda Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 54.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Iveda Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Iveda Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $1B is higher than Iveda Solutions's net income of -$555K. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.02x while Iveda Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.70x versus 1.13x for Iveda Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of 10.26% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 25.42%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 16.05% beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 30.38%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $560.36, signalling upside risk potential of 19.34%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.62%. Given that NAPCO Security Technologies has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.177%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 54.28% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $44M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $1B is higher than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.02x while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.70x versus 7.05x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of 10.26% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of 8.01%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 16.05% beat Universal Security Instruments's return on equity of -4.73%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $560.36, signalling upside risk potential of 19.34%. On the other hand Universal Security Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Universal Security Instruments, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Universal Security Instruments.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Security Instruments has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.466%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Universal Security Instruments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 54.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Security Instruments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Universal Security Instruments quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $1B is higher than Universal Security Instruments's net income of $577K. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.02x while Universal Security Instruments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.70x versus 0.24x for Universal Security Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VerifyMe has a net margin of 10.26% compared to Northrop Grumman's net margin of -44.6%. Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 16.05% beat VerifyMe's return on equity of -27.97%.

Northrop Grumman has a consensus price target of $560.36, signalling upside risk potential of 19.34%. On the other hand VerifyMe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.94%. Given that VerifyMe has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe VerifyMe is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.334, which suggesting that the stock is 66.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VerifyMe has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.25%.

Northrop Grumman has a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. VerifyMe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northrop Grumman pays 54.28% of its earnings as a dividend. VerifyMe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than VerifyMe quarterly revenues of $5.4M. Northrop Grumman's net income of $1B is higher than VerifyMe's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Northrop Grumman's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.02x while VerifyMe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northrop Grumman is 1.70x versus 0.25x for VerifyMe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.