GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of -6.21% compared to General Motors's net margin of -169.41%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.57% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $61.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.54%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Lucid Group.

General Motors has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $47.7B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. General Motors's net income of -$3B is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 7.02x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -6.21% compared to General Motors's net margin of -42.85%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.57% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $61.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.54%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.19%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

General Motors has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $47.7B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. General Motors's net income of -$3B is lower than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 2.53x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -6.21% compared to General Motors's net margin of 9.17%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.57% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $61.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.54%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $330.38 which suggests that it could grow by 21.63%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

General Motors has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $47.7B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. General Motors's net income of -$3B is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Tesla's PE ratio is 133.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 9.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of -6.21% compared to General Motors's net margin of -0.83%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.57% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $61.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.54%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $58.25 which suggests that it could grow by 67.58%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.426, which suggesting that the stock is 42.563% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.706, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.616%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $47.7B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $625.6M. General Motors's net income of -$3B is lower than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.28x versus 0.36x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.