RIVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of -125.86% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 6.27%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23% beat General Motors's return on equity of 15.22%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $15.03, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $53.31 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.238%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $874M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $48.8B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B is lower than General Motors's net income of $3.1B. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 5.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 0.34x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canoo has a net margin of -125.86% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -819.84%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23% beat Canoo's return on equity of -69.19%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $15.03, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Canoo has an analysts' consensus of $12.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3804.43%. Given that Canoo has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Canoo is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canoo has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.492%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $874M, which are larger than Canoo quarterly revenues of $891K. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Canoo's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canoo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus -- for Canoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -125.86% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -496.14%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $15.03, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -6.22%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $874M, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 9.51x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -125.86% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 8.61%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $15.03, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $874M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 3.00x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.