LCID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of -496.14% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of 6.27%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79% beat General Motors's return on equity of 15.22%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -7.82%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $59.21 which suggests that it could grow by 16.09%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.376%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $200M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $48.8B. Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M is lower than General Motors's net income of $3.1B. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 5.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 9.41x versus 0.33x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canoo has a net margin of -496.14% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -819.84%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79% beat Canoo's return on equity of -69.19%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -7.82%. On the other hand Canoo has an analysts' consensus of $42.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3246.46%. Given that Canoo has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Canoo is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canoo has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.553%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $200M, which are larger than Canoo quarterly revenues of $891K. Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M is lower than Canoo's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canoo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 9.41x versus -- for Canoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -496.14% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -125.86%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -7.82%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 5.01%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $200M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 9.41x versus 3.09x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -496.14% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of 8.61%. Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling downside risk potential of -7.82%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $295.52 which suggests that it could fall by -25.17%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Lucid Group, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Lucid Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucid Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lucid Group quarterly revenues are $200M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Lucid Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 108.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucid Group is 9.41x versus 14.19x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.