CAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of -0.19%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $355.08, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $194.16 which suggests that it could grow by 9.11%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Boeing.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.789%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.31x versus 1.75x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 10.52%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $355.08, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $489.89 which suggests that it could grow by 6.66%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Deere &.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.33000000000001%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.31x versus 2.69x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gencor Industries has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 10.01%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Gencor Industries's return on equity of 8.69%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $355.08, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Gencor Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.48%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Gencor Industries, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Gencor Industries.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gencor Industries has a beta of 0.573, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.742%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Gencor Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Gencor Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Gencor Industries quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Gencor Industries's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while Gencor Industries's PE ratio is 16.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.31x versus 1.64x for Gencor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manitowoc has a net margin of 17.21% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 9.51%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 57.91% beat Manitowoc's return on equity of 9.18%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $355.08, signalling upside risk potential of 15.87%. On the other hand Manitowoc has an analysts' consensus of $10.85 which suggests that it could grow by 34.45%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.208, which suggesting that the stock is 20.794% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manitowoc has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.189%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Manitowoc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Manitowoc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Manitowoc quarterly revenues of $596M. Caterpillar's net income of $2.8B is higher than Manitowoc's net income of $56.7M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while Manitowoc's PE ratio is 5.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.31x versus 0.13x for Manitowoc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.