RLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 9.31% compared to RLI's net margin of 9.65%. RLI's return on equity of 22.2% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 24.03%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $79.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.09%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.55%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 50.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.2%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Heritage Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RLI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $439.1M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $210.3M. RLI's net income of $40.9M is higher than Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $20.3M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while Heritage Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.04x versus 0.67x for Heritage Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 9.31% compared to RLI's net margin of 7.4%. RLI's return on equity of 22.2% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $79.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.09%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.4%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 50.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.499%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $439.1M, which are smaller than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. RLI's net income of $40.9M is lower than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.04x versus 0.54x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 9.31% compared to RLI's net margin of 11.63%. RLI's return on equity of 22.2% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $79.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.09%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.8235 which suggests that it could grow by 5.94%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 50.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $439.1M, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. RLI's net income of $40.9M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.04x versus 2.15x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 9.31% compared to RLI's net margin of 15.48%. RLI's return on equity of 22.2% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $79.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.09%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $67.54 which suggests that it could fall by -1.33%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

RLI has a beta of 0.490, which suggesting that the stock is 50.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. RLI pays 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $439.1M, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. RLI's net income of $40.9M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.66x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.04x versus 2.01x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.