PGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 11.63% compared to Progressive's net margin of 11.68%. Progressive's return on equity of 35.88% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $290.6471, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.29 which suggests that it could grow by 16.49%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Progressive.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Progressive's net income of $2.4B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 2.15x versus 0.80x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 11.63% compared to Progressive's net margin of 0.58%. Progressive's return on equity of 35.88% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $290.6471, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.46%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Progressive's net income of $2.4B is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 2.15x versus 0.93x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 11.63% compared to Progressive's net margin of 7.4%. Progressive's return on equity of 35.88% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $290.6471, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.38%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Progressive.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.499%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Progressive's net income of $2.4B is higher than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 2.15x versus 0.52x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 11.63% compared to Progressive's net margin of 17.33%. Progressive's return on equity of 35.88% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $290.6471, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $271.34 which suggests that it could grow by 10.69%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Progressive.

Progressive has a beta of 0.380, which suggesting that the stock is 61.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.825%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. Progressive's net income of $2.4B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.14x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 2.15x versus 1.22x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.