WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 12.55%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $66.32, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $87.68 which suggests that it could grow by 12.89%. Given that American International Group has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe American International Group is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.765%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. American International Group offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.92x versus 1.54x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.68%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $66.32, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.88 which suggests that it could grow by 23.12%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Allstate offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while Allstate's PE ratio is 10.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.92x versus 0.77x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 0.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $66.32, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.83%. Given that WR Berkley has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.92x versus 0.89x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 17.33%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $66.32, signalling upside risk potential of 1.72%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $270.63 which suggests that it could grow by 14.72%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.825%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.97x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.92x versus 1.18x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.