CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 0.58%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $151.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.52%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.3%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.18x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.86x versus 0.94x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First American Financial has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 4.32%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 2.67%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $151.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.52%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $75.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.01%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.761%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 168.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First American Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than First American Financial's net income of $72.4M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.18x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 48.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.86x versus 1.04x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 12.54%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.46%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $151.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.52%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $130.31 which suggests that it could grow by 10.74%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than The Hartford Financial Services Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than The Hartford Financial Services Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.111%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 18.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $853M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.18x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 11.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.86x versus 1.33x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 1.56%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $151.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.52%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.21%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.271%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.48%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $384.8M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.18x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.86x versus 0.43x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.