RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoZone has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 13.2%. RH's return on equity of 89.98% beat AutoZone's return on equity of --.

RH has a consensus price target of $439.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.13%. On the other hand AutoZone has an analysts' consensus of $3,610.22 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.442, which suggesting that the stock is 144.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.819%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoZone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoZone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are smaller than AutoZone quarterly revenues of $4.3B. RH's net income of $33.2M is lower than AutoZone's net income of $564.9M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.88x while AutoZone's PE ratio is 21.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 2.60x versus 3.11x for AutoZone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Live Ventures has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of -17.62%. RH's return on equity of 89.98% beat Live Ventures's return on equity of -28.94%.

RH has a consensus price target of $439.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.13%. On the other hand Live Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1252.94%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.442, which suggesting that the stock is 144.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Live Ventures has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.061%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Live Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Live Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are larger than Live Ventures quarterly revenues of $112.7M. RH's net income of $33.2M is higher than Live Ventures's net income of -$19.9M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.88x while Live Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 2.60x versus 0.07x for Live Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tile Shop Holdings has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 0.05%. RH's return on equity of 89.98% beat Tile Shop Holdings's return on equity of 2.96%.

RH has a consensus price target of $439.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.13%. On the other hand Tile Shop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.81%. Given that Tile Shop Holdings has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Tile Shop Holdings is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.442, which suggesting that the stock is 144.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tile Shop Holdings has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.374%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tile Shop Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tile Shop Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are larger than Tile Shop Holdings quarterly revenues of $84.5M. RH's net income of $33.2M is higher than Tile Shop Holdings's net income of $41K. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.88x while Tile Shop Holdings's PE ratio is 81.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 2.60x versus 0.82x for Tile Shop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 4.09% compared to RH's net margin of 13.83%. RH's return on equity of 89.98% beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11%.

RH has a consensus price target of $439.06, signalling upside risk potential of 6.13%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $148.01 which suggests that it could fall by -10.96%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

RH has a beta of 2.442, which suggesting that the stock is 144.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.652%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $811.7M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $1.8B. RH's net income of $33.2M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 118.88x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 2.60x versus 3.23x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.