AZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Best Buy has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 0.84%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Best Buy's return on equity of 30.63%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,787.42, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand Best Buy has an analysts' consensus of $88.46 which suggests that it could grow by 43.23%. Given that Best Buy has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Best Buy is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Best Buy has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.871%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Best Buy offers a yield of 6.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy pays out 87.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Best Buy quarterly revenues of $13.9B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than Best Buy's net income of $117M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while Best Buy's PE ratio is 14.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.44x versus 0.32x for Best Buy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 13.46%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,787.42, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,421.01 which suggests that it could grow by 0.48%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than O'Reilly Automotive, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than O'Reilly Automotive.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.438%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.1B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $551.1M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 34.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.44x versus 4.97x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarParts.com has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of -11.55%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat CarParts.com's return on equity of -39.94%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,787.42, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand CarParts.com has an analysts' consensus of $1.90 which suggests that it could grow by 133.85%. Given that CarParts.com has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe CarParts.com is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarParts.com has a beta of 2.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.105%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarParts.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarParts.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than CarParts.com quarterly revenues of $133.5M. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than CarParts.com's net income of -$15.4M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while CarParts.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.44x versus 0.08x for CarParts.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 9.93%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 40.64%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,787.42, signalling upside risk potential of 2.9%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $155.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.23%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.878%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.9B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $586.8M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.71x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 22.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.44x versus 2.25x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.