WSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of -11.5%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -32.09%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $183.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.26%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 332.69%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.158%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 45.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $181.6M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$20.9M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.21x while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 3.23x versus 0.03x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 7.45%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 42.47%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $183.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.26%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $244.49 which suggests that it could grow by 14.01%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 33.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M is higher than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $227.8M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.21x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 15.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 3.23x versus 1.33x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 0.2%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11% beat Five Below's return on equity of 17.27%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $183.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.26%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $118.15 which suggests that it could grow by 40.29%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.791%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $843.7M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M is higher than Five Below's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.21x while Five Below's PE ratio is 17.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 3.23x versus 1.22x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RH has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 4.09%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11% beat RH's return on equity of --.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $183.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.26%. On the other hand RH has an analysts' consensus of $457.48 which suggests that it could grow by 48.91%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.822, which suggesting that the stock is 82.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RH has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.385%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. RH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. RH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than RH quarterly revenues of $811.7M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M is higher than RH's net income of $33.2M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.21x while RH's PE ratio is 88.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 3.23x versus 1.93x for RH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.