ARHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Floor & Decor Holdings has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 4.29%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat Floor & Decor Holdings's return on equity of 10.05%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 46.54%. On the other hand Floor & Decor Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $102.21 which suggests that it could grow by 36.21%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Floor & Decor Holdings, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Floor & Decor Holdings.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Floor & Decor Holdings has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.701%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Floor & Decor Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Floor & Decor Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are smaller than Floor & Decor Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is lower than Floor & Decor Holdings's net income of $47.5M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while Floor & Decor Holdings's PE ratio is 39.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.87x versus 1.82x for Floor & Decor Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genuine Parts has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 2.31%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat Genuine Parts's return on equity of 20.13%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 46.54%. On the other hand Genuine Parts has an analysts' consensus of $130.31 which suggests that it could grow by 13.07%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Genuine Parts, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Genuine Parts.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genuine Parts has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.877%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genuine Parts offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts pays out 61.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Genuine Parts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Arhaus's is not.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are smaller than Genuine Parts quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is lower than Genuine Parts's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while Genuine Parts's PE ratio is 17.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.87x versus 0.69x for Genuine Parts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 1.5%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.11%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 46.54%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.42 which suggests that it could grow by 23.49%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than CarMax.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.344%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6B. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is lower than CarMax's net income of $89.9M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while CarMax's PE ratio is 21.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.87x versus 0.40x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 6.14% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 15.63%. Arhaus's return on equity of 21.43% beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of $11.58, signalling upside risk potential of 46.54%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $174.10 which suggests that it could grow by 17.44%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.443%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Arhaus pays 102.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Arhaus's is not.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $347M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Arhaus's net income of $21.3M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.12x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 16.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 0.87x versus 2.46x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.