ARHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Live Ventures has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Arhaus's net margin of -17.62%. Arhaus's return on equity of 25.08% beat Live Ventures's return on equity of -28.94%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.04%. On the other hand Live Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1252.94%. Given that Live Ventures has higher upside potential than Arhaus, analysts believe Live Ventures is more attractive than Arhaus.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Live Ventures has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.061%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Live Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Live Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $319.1M, which are larger than Live Ventures quarterly revenues of $112.7M. Arhaus's net income of $9.9M is higher than Live Ventures's net income of -$19.9M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Live Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.06x versus 0.07x for Live Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RH has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 4.09%. Arhaus's return on equity of 25.08% beat RH's return on equity of 89.98%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.04%. On the other hand RH has an analysts' consensus of $439.06 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than RH.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RH has a beta of 2.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.16%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $319.1M, which are smaller than RH quarterly revenues of $811.7M. Arhaus's net income of $9.9M is lower than RH's net income of $33.2M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while RH's PE ratio is 118.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.06x versus 2.60x for RH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tile Shop Holdings has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 0.05%. Arhaus's return on equity of 25.08% beat Tile Shop Holdings's return on equity of 2.96%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.04%. On the other hand Tile Shop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.81%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Tile Shop Holdings, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Tile Shop Holdings.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tile Shop Holdings has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.374%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tile Shop Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arhaus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tile Shop Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $319.1M, which are larger than Tile Shop Holdings quarterly revenues of $84.5M. Arhaus's net income of $9.9M is higher than Tile Shop Holdings's net income of $41K. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Tile Shop Holdings's PE ratio is 81.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.06x versus 0.82x for Tile Shop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 3.11% compared to Arhaus's net margin of 13.83%. Arhaus's return on equity of 25.08% beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 53.11%.

Arhaus has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.04%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $148.01 which suggests that it could fall by -10.96%. Given that Arhaus has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Arhaus is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Arhaus has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.652%.

Arhaus has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Arhaus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arhaus quarterly revenues are $319.1M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Arhaus's net income of $9.9M is lower than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $249M. Notably, Arhaus's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.09x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arhaus is 1.06x versus 3.23x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.