GPRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 9.43%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $15.79, signalling upside risk potential of 53.11%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $7.63 which suggests that it could grow by 43.6%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.953%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 37.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.79x versus 2.00x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinor ASA has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 8.98%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $15.79, signalling upside risk potential of 53.11%. On the other hand Equinor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $28.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.298%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. Equinor ASA offers a yield of 5.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Equinor ASA quarterly revenues of $25.4B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is lower than Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Equinor ASA's PE ratio is 7.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.79x versus 0.69x for Equinor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Repsol SA has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 1.21%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Repsol SA's return on equity of 12.1%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $15.79, signalling upside risk potential of 53.11%. On the other hand Repsol SA has an analysts' consensus of $10.75 which suggests that it could fall by -13.52%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Repsol SA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Repsol SA.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Repsol SA has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.018%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. Repsol SA offers a yield of 7.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Repsol SA pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Repsol SA quarterly revenues of $15.1B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is lower than Repsol SA's net income of $182.6M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Repsol SA's PE ratio is 4.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.79x versus 0.19x for Repsol SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunoco LP has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of -0.61%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Sunoco LP's return on equity of 20.66%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $15.79, signalling upside risk potential of 53.11%. On the other hand Sunoco LP has an analysts' consensus of $63.38 which suggests that it could grow by 20.22%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Sunoco LP, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Sunoco LP.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunoco LP has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.072%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. Sunoco LP offers a yield of 6.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunoco LP pays out 119.29% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sunoco LP's is not.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Sunoco LP quarterly revenues of $5.8B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is higher than Sunoco LP's net income of -$35M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.23x while Sunoco LP's PE ratio is 12.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.79x versus 0.24x for Sunoco LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.