EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eni SpA has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 2.53%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat Eni SpA's return on equity of 4.67%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand Eni SpA has an analysts' consensus of $34.58 which suggests that it could grow by 31.15%. Given that Eni SpA has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Eni SpA is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eni SpA has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.457%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Eni SpA offers a yield of 7.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Eni SpA pays out 63.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are larger than Eni SpA quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is higher than Eni SpA's net income of $574.1M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while Eni SpA's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 0.44x for Eni SpA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 11.69%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 21.46%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $33.40 which suggests that it could grow by 15.61%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.569, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.897%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 77.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are larger than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is higher than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $274.6M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 19.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 1.46x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 6.04%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.26%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $78.99 which suggests that it could grow by 30.25%. Given that Shell PLC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Shell PLC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.844%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 43.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $71.1B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is lower than Shell PLC's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 12.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 0.67x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 4.84%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 14.11%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.08%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $74.26 which suggests that it could grow by 37.13%. Given that TotalEnergies SE has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe TotalEnergies SE is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.601, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.859%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 6.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 35.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are smaller than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $47.4B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.84x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 7.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 0.63x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.