EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shell PLC has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 1.4%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $28.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $75.60 which suggests that it could grow by 17.89%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.737%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.98%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $66.3B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is higher than Shell PLC's net income of $928M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.65x versus 0.73x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 22.53%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $28.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $47.27 which suggests that it could grow by 112.34%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.98%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is higher than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.65x versus 0.96x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunoco LP has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 1.96%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat Sunoco LP's return on equity of 24.39%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $28.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand Sunoco LP has an analysts' consensus of $64.13 which suggests that it could grow by 21.36%. Given that Sunoco LP has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Sunoco LP is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunoco LP has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.552%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.98%. Sunoco LP offers a yield of 6.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunoco LP pays out 79.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are larger than Sunoco LP quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is higher than Sunoco LP's net income of $103M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while Sunoco LP's PE ratio is 8.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.65x versus 0.28x for Sunoco LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of 7.52% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 8.4%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 13.14%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $28.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.82%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $72.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.44%. Given that TotalEnergies SE has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe TotalEnergies SE is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, which suggesting that the stock is 41.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.438, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.242%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.98%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 5.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 48.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $26.5B, which are smaller than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $47.1B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2B is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $4B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.53x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 8.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.65x versus 0.69x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.