AROC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NextDecade has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Archrock's net margin of --. Archrock's return on equity of 16.37% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Archrock has a consensus price target of $31.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 45.67%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Archrock, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Archrock.

Archrock has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Archrock has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archrock pays 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archrock quarterly revenues are $326.4M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Archrock's net income of $59.8M is lower than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Archrock's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.23x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archrock is 3.68x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Archrock's net margin of -6.25%. Archrock's return on equity of 16.37% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Archrock has a consensus price target of $31.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.62%. Given that Archrock has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Archrock is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Archrock has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 209.72%.

Archrock has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archrock pays 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archrock quarterly revenues are $326.4M, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Archrock's net income of $59.8M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Archrock's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.23x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archrock is 3.68x versus 0.08x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Archrock's net margin of 7.86%. Archrock's return on equity of 16.37% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05%.

Archrock has a consensus price target of $31.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.46%. Given that Archrock has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Archrock is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Archrock has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.937, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.698%.

Archrock has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archrock pays 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archrock quarterly revenues are $326.4M, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $713.5M. Archrock's net income of $59.8M is higher than Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M. Notably, Archrock's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.23x while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 15.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archrock is 3.68x versus 0.84x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Archrock's net margin of 22.53%. Archrock's return on equity of 16.37% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Archrock has a consensus price target of $31.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $47.67 which suggests that it could grow by 59.15%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Archrock, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Archrock.

Archrock has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Archrock has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Archrock pays 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archrock quarterly revenues are $326.4M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Archrock's net income of $59.8M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Archrock's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.23x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 4.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archrock is 3.68x versus 1.30x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.