NEXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of 16.01%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $51.43 which suggests that it could grow by 16.63%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.178%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $7.4B. NextDecade's net income of $65.7M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 1.59x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of -8.82%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 180.9%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than NextDecade.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.982, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.243%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.5M. NextDecade's net income of $65.7M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 0.08x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of 7.86%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.35%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.051%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $713.5M. NextDecade's net income of $65.7M is higher than Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 0.83x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of -- compared to NextDecade's net margin of 91.93%. NextDecade's return on equity of -- beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 11.34%.

NextDecade has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $59.21 which suggests that it could grow by 33.88%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than NextDecade.

NextDecade has a beta of 1.185, which suggesting that the stock is 18.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 1.691, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.094%.

NextDecade has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. NextDecade pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

NextDecade quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $228.5M. NextDecade's net income of $65.7M is lower than Viper Energy's net income of $210.1M. Notably, NextDecade's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 12.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NextDecade is -- versus 4.83x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.