EPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mexco Energy has a net margin of -9% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 24.81%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.94%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.508, which suggesting that the stock is 49.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.589%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $20.3M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.80x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 11.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.61x versus 2.06x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PEDEVCO has a net margin of -9% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 32.21%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16% beat PEDEVCO's return on equity of 2.3%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.94%. On the other hand PEDEVCO has an analysts' consensus of $1.83 which suggests that it could grow by 228.83%. Given that PEDEVCO has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe PEDEVCO is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.508, which suggesting that the stock is 49.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PEDEVCO has a beta of 0.288, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.243%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. PEDEVCO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. PEDEVCO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $20.3M, which are larger than PEDEVCO quarterly revenues of $9.1M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M is lower than PEDEVCO's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.80x while PEDEVCO's PE ratio is 2.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.61x versus 1.25x for PEDEVCO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of -9% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 6.78%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.94%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 275%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.508, which suggesting that the stock is 49.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.003%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $20.3M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.80x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.61x versus 0.44x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian has a net margin of -9% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 10.64%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16% beat Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 18.81%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $7.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.94%. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian has an analysts' consensus of $50.50 which suggests that it could grow by 110.86%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.508, which suggesting that the stock is 49.152% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.599%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Riley Exploration Permian offers a yield of 6.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian pays out 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $20.3M, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues of $102.7M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.80x while Riley Exploration Permian's PE ratio is 5.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.61x versus 1.22x for Riley Exploration Permian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.