REI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 37.96% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 9.43%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 140%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, which suggesting that the stock is 59.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $89.2M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 34.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.65x versus 1.84x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 37.96% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of -111.16%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -32.89%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 140%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, which suggesting that the stock is 59.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.938%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $89.2M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $130.2K. Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$144.8K. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.65x versus 20.44x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of 37.96% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 18.13%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 6.97%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 140%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, which suggesting that the stock is 59.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.786%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $89.2M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M is higher than Mexco Energy's net income of $317.2K. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.65x versus 3.45x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian has a net margin of 37.96% compared to Ring Energy's net margin of 25.08%. Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15% beat Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 25.88%.

Ring Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 140%. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 69.58%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Riley Exploration Permian, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Riley Exploration Permian.

Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, which suggesting that the stock is 59.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.071%.

Ring Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riley Exploration Permian offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Ring Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian pays out 24.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ring Energy quarterly revenues are $89.2M, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues of $102.3M. Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M is higher than Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Ring Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.19x while Riley Exploration Permian's PE ratio is 5.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ring Energy is 0.65x versus 1.53x for Riley Exploration Permian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.