REPX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 10.64% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of -4786.13%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 18.81% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -93.33%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 110.24%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.253%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $166.5K. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $10.9M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$8M. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.64x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.22x versus 11.65x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of 10.64% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of 24.81%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 18.81% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 110.24%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.589%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $10.9M is higher than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.64x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.22x versus 2.09x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 10.64% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of 6.78%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 18.81% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.21%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 110.24%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 247.87%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Riley Exploration Permian, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Riley Exploration Permian.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.003%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $10.9M is higher than Ring Energy's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.64x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.22x versus 0.47x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vitesse Energy has a net margin of 10.64% compared to Riley Exploration Permian's net margin of -9.16%. Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 18.81% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity of 4.04%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 110.24%. On the other hand Vitesse Energy has an analysts' consensus of $30.25 which suggests that it could grow by 48.14%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Vitesse Energy, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Vitesse Energy.

Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Riley Exploration Permian has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.16%. Vitesse Energy offers a yield of 10.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Riley Exploration Permian pays 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Vitesse Energy pays out 301.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Vitesse Energy's is not.

Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues are $102.7M, which are larger than Vitesse Energy quarterly revenues of $55.9M. Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $10.9M is higher than Vitesse Energy's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Riley Exploration Permian's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.64x while Vitesse Energy's PE ratio is 32.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riley Exploration Permian is 1.22x versus 2.72x for Vitesse Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.