BOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

City Holding has a net margin of 24.25% compared to Bank of Hawaii's net margin of 40.9%. Bank of Hawaii's return on equity of 9.62% beat City Holding's return on equity of 16.64%.

Bank of Hawaii has a consensus price target of $70.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.02%. On the other hand City Holding has an analysts' consensus of $120.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.69%. Given that Bank of Hawaii has higher upside potential than City Holding, analysts believe Bank of Hawaii is more attractive than City Holding.

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 13.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison City Holding has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.965%.

Bank of Hawaii has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. City Holding offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Bank of Hawaii pays 83.31% of its earnings as a dividend. City Holding pays out 37.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Hawaii quarterly revenues are $161.5M, which are larger than City Holding quarterly revenues of $70.1M. Bank of Hawaii's net income of $39.2M is higher than City Holding's net income of $28.7M. Notably, Bank of Hawaii's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while City Holding's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Hawaii is 4.03x versus 5.84x for City Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Financial Bankshares has a net margin of 24.25% compared to Bank of Hawaii's net margin of 43.39%. Bank of Hawaii's return on equity of 9.62% beat First Financial Bankshares's return on equity of 14.37%.

Bank of Hawaii has a consensus price target of $70.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.02%. On the other hand First Financial Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $39.25 which suggests that it could grow by 20.57%. Given that First Financial Bankshares has higher upside potential than Bank of Hawaii, analysts believe First Financial Bankshares is more attractive than Bank of Hawaii.

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 13.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Financial Bankshares has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.078%.

Bank of Hawaii has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. First Financial Bankshares offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Bank of Hawaii pays 83.31% of its earnings as a dividend. First Financial Bankshares pays out 46.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Hawaii quarterly revenues are $161.5M, which are larger than First Financial Bankshares quarterly revenues of $143.6M. Bank of Hawaii's net income of $39.2M is lower than First Financial Bankshares's net income of $62.3M. Notably, Bank of Hawaii's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while First Financial Bankshares's PE ratio is 21.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Hawaii is 4.03x versus 8.73x for First Financial Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

German American Bancorp has a net margin of 24.25% compared to Bank of Hawaii's net margin of 35.63%. Bank of Hawaii's return on equity of 9.62% beat German American Bancorp's return on equity of 12.09%.

Bank of Hawaii has a consensus price target of $70.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.02%. On the other hand German American Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.17%. Given that German American Bancorp has higher upside potential than Bank of Hawaii, analysts believe German American Bancorp is more attractive than Bank of Hawaii.

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 13.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison German American Bancorp has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.849%.

Bank of Hawaii has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. German American Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Bank of Hawaii pays 83.31% of its earnings as a dividend. German American Bancorp pays out 38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Hawaii quarterly revenues are $161.5M, which are larger than German American Bancorp quarterly revenues of $65.1M. Bank of Hawaii's net income of $39.2M is higher than German American Bancorp's net income of $23.2M. Notably, Bank of Hawaii's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while German American Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Hawaii is 4.03x versus 4.91x for German American Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 24.25% compared to Bank of Hawaii's net margin of 32.77%. Bank of Hawaii's return on equity of 9.62% beat Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59%.

Bank of Hawaii has a consensus price target of $70.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.02%. On the other hand Hancock Whitney has an analysts' consensus of $62.88 which suggests that it could grow by 29.59%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than Bank of Hawaii, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than Bank of Hawaii.

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 13.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.44%.

Bank of Hawaii has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Hancock Whitney offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Bank of Hawaii pays 83.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bank of Hawaii quarterly revenues are $161.5M, which are smaller than Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues of $364.7M. Bank of Hawaii's net income of $39.2M is lower than Hancock Whitney's net income of $119.5M. Notably, Bank of Hawaii's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.56x while Hancock Whitney's PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bank of Hawaii is 4.03x versus 2.90x for Hancock Whitney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.