HWC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Capital City Bank Group has a net margin of 33.56% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 22.77%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat Capital City Bank Group's return on equity of 11.26%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $69.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand Capital City Bank Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.17 which suggests that it could grow by 20.41%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than Capital City Bank Group, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than Capital City Bank Group.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital City Bank Group has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.727%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Capital City Bank Group offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital City Bank Group pays out 28.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $363.7M, which are larger than Capital City Bank Group quarterly revenues of $57.5M. Hancock Whitney's net income of $122.1M is higher than Capital City Bank Group's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Capital City Bank Group's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.13x versus 2.69x for Capital City Bank Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Community has a net margin of 33.56% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 26.27%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat First Community's return on equity of 10.13%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $69.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand First Community has an analysts' consensus of $29.67 which suggests that it could grow by 32.68%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than First Community, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than First Community.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Community has a beta of 0.412, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.815%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. First Community offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. First Community pays out 31.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $363.7M, which are larger than First Community quarterly revenues of $16.1M. Hancock Whitney's net income of $122.1M is higher than First Community's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while First Community's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.13x versus 2.82x for First Community. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 33.56% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 29.42%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $69.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $26.60 which suggests that it could grow by 24.16%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.102%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $363.7M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Hancock Whitney's net income of $122.1M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $534M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 11.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.13x versus 2.78x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 33.56% compared to Hancock Whitney's net margin of 25.81%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $69.03, signalling upside risk potential of 33.11%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.99%. Given that Hancock Whitney has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Hancock Whitney is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.136%.

Hancock Whitney has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Hancock Whitney pays 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues are $363.7M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. Hancock Whitney's net income of $122.1M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Hancock Whitney's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.82x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hancock Whitney is 3.13x versus 3.06x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.