BBWI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ross Stores has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Bath & Body Works's net margin of 9.93%. Bath & Body Works's return on equity of -- beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 40.64%.

Bath & Body Works has a consensus price target of $45.51, signalling upside risk potential of 65.49%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $155.48 which suggests that it could grow by 12.11%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Ross Stores.

Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.878%.

Bath & Body Works has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Bath & Body Works pays 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $586.8M. Notably, Bath & Body Works's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.55x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 21.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bath & Body Works is 0.83x versus 2.17x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Bath & Body Works's net margin of 6.51%. Bath & Body Works's return on equity of -- beat Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79%.

Bath & Body Works has a consensus price target of $45.51, signalling upside risk potential of 65.49%. On the other hand Sally Beauty Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.20 which suggests that it could grow by 64.79%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings.

Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.97%.

Bath & Body Works has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Sally Beauty Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bath & Body Works pays 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Sally Beauty Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues of $937.9M. Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M is higher than Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M. Notably, Bath & Body Works's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.55x while Sally Beauty Holdings's PE ratio is 4.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bath & Body Works is 0.83x versus 0.23x for Sally Beauty Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Bath & Body Works's net margin of 11.28%. Bath & Body Works's return on equity of -- beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13%.

Bath & Body Works has a consensus price target of $45.51, signalling upside risk potential of 65.49%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $411.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.66%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.541%.

Bath & Body Works has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bath & Body Works pays 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M is higher than Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M. Notably, Bath & Body Works's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.55x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bath & Body Works is 0.83x versus 1.47x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 16.25% compared to Bath & Body Works's net margin of 15.63%. Bath & Body Works's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9%.

Bath & Body Works has a consensus price target of $45.51, signalling upside risk potential of 65.49%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma has an analysts' consensus of $174.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.68%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.443%.

Bath & Body Works has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Williams-Sonoma offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Bath & Body Works pays 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma pays out 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M is higher than Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M. Notably, Bath & Body Works's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.55x while Williams-Sonoma's PE ratio is 15.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bath & Body Works is 0.83x versus 2.29x for Williams-Sonoma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.