ULTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casey's General Stores has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 2.23%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $411.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.21%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores has an analysts' consensus of $439.90 which suggests that it could fall by -1.66%. Given that Ulta Beauty has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Ulta Beauty is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.74%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casey's General Stores offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores pays out 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Casey's General Stores's PE ratio is 31.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.61x versus 1.07x for Casey's General Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 7.7%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $411.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.21%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $228.27 which suggests that it could grow by 21.57%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.866%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.61x versus 1.16x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 13.48%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.46%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $411.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.21%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $94.84 which suggests that it could grow by 25.8%. Given that Five Below has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Five Below is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.534%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Five Below's net income of $187.5M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Five Below's PE ratio is 16.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.61x versus 1.07x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 6.51%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13% beat Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79%.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $411.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.21%. On the other hand Sally Beauty Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.20 which suggests that it could grow by 69.45%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.155, which suggesting that the stock is 15.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.97%.

Ulta Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sally Beauty Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ulta Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sally Beauty Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues of $937.9M. Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M is higher than Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M. Notably, Ulta Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Sally Beauty Holdings's PE ratio is 4.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ulta Beauty is 1.61x versus 0.22x for Sally Beauty Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.