CASY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Etsy has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 15.24%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $438.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.15%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $55.26 which suggests that it could grow by 29.96%. Given that Etsy has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Etsy is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 2.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.351%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Etsy quarterly revenues of $852.2M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Etsy's net income of $129.9M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Etsy's PE ratio is 17.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.10x versus 1.99x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 9.93%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 40.64%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $438.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.15%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $155.48 which suggests that it could grow by 12.11%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.878%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $586.8M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 21.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.10x versus 2.17x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of -2.09%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity of -35.4%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $438.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.15%. On the other hand Stitch Fix has an analysts' consensus of $4.30 which suggests that it could grow by 44.3%. Given that Stitch Fix has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Stitch Fix is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.456%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Stitch Fix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Stitch Fix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Stitch Fix quarterly revenues of $312.1M. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is higher than Stitch Fix's net income of -$6.5M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Stitch Fix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.10x versus 0.29x for Stitch Fix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Casey's General Stores's net margin of 11.28%. Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13%.

Casey's General Stores has a consensus price target of $438.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.15%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $411.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.66%. Given that Ulta Beauty has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Ulta Beauty is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.541%.

Casey's General Stores has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Casey's General Stores pays 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M. Notably, Casey's General Stores's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.87x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Casey's General Stores is 1.10x versus 1.47x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.