SBH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bath & Body Works has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 16.25%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79% beat Bath & Body Works's return on equity of --.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling upside risk potential of 48.43%. On the other hand Bath & Body Works has an analysts' consensus of $46.49 which suggests that it could grow by 53.54%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.642%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bath & Body Works offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works pays out 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $937.9M, which are smaller than Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M is lower than Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.14x while Bath & Body Works's PE ratio is 8.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.91x for Bath & Body Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 7.7%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 40.21%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling upside risk potential of 48.43%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $234.44 which suggests that it could grow by 19.95%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.609%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $937.9M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $300M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.14x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.24x versus 1.21x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of -0.11%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -13.01%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling upside risk potential of 48.43%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.30 which suggests that it could grow by 230.79%. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than Sally Beauty Holdings, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than Sally Beauty Holdings.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.493%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $937.9M, which are larger than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues of $324.3M. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M is higher than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$364K. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.14x while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.24x versus 0.03x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 6.51% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 11.28%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 29.79% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 51.13%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.75, signalling upside risk potential of 48.43%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $410.24 which suggests that it could grow by 17.02%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.491% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.036%.

Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $937.9M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $61M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $393.3M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.14x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 13.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.24x versus 1.47x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.