Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
34
BABA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$82.34
Seasonality move
:
-1.29%
Day range:
$81.70 - $83.00
52-week range:
$66.63 - $117.82
Dividend yield:
2.43%
P/E ratio:
16.89x
P/S ratio:
1.52x
P/B ratio:
1.44x
Volume:
21.2M
Avg. volume:
15.8M
1-year change:
12.17%
Market cap:
$196B
Revenue:
$131.6B
EPS (TTM):
$4.87
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$33.2B | $2.06 | 5.66% | 247.98% | $121.05 |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
$157.3B | $1.14 | 10.17% | 47.16% | $239.92 |
|
JD
JD.com
|
$36.3B | $1.04 | 3.82% | 151.51% | $48.83 |
|
NIO
NIO
|
$2.7B | -$0.31 | 21.59% | -30.59% | $6.32 |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
$14.3B | $2.72 | 29.01% | 20.78% | $149.72 |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$25.4B | $0.60 | 8.83% | -66.33% | $283.88 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$82.28 | $121.05 | $196B | 16.89x | $1.66 | 2.43% | 1.52x |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
$224.92 | $239.92 | $2.4T | 48.16x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.87x |
|
JD
JD.com
|
$35.64 | $48.83 | $51.7B | 11.32x | $0.76 | 2.13% | 0.36x |
|
NIO
NIO
|
$4.54 | $6.32 | $9.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.02x |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
$99.58 | $149.72 | $138.3B | 9.75x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.83x |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$421.06 | $283.88 | $1.4T | 115.36x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
17.49% | -0.330 | 10.72% | 1.27x |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
17.48% | 1.364 | 2.8% | 0.87x |
|
JD
JD.com
|
21.75% | -0.807 | 13.38% | 0.81x |
|
NIO
NIO
|
65.48% | 0.658 | 20.97% | 0.77x |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
1.83% | -0.623 | 0.39% | 1.79x |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
9.56% | 1.482 | 0.88% | 1.21x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$12.9B | $4.9B | 6.68% | 7.78% | 22.15% | $280.2M |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
$31B | $17.4B | 18.02% | 22.73% | 11.73% | $3.4B |
|
JD
JD.com
|
$6.3B | $1.7B | 10.04% | 11.87% | 6.12% | -$843.5M |
|
NIO
NIO
|
$280.4M | -$731.5M | -45.48% | -98.45% | -25.8% | -- |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
$8.3B | $3.4B | 47.37% | 48.98% | 29.37% | $3.9B |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$5B | $2.8B | 18.19% | 19.77% | 11.42% | $2.7B |
Alibaba Group Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or AMZN?
Amazon.com has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 9.65%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 22.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $2.53 $179.7B AMZNAmazon.com19.51% $1.43 $314B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $121.05, signalling upside risk potential of 47.12%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $239.92 which suggests that it could grow by 6.67%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Amazon.com.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding28 8 0 AMZNAmazon.com45 3 0 -
Is BABA or AMZN More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.077%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $158.9B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $15.3B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 48.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.52x versus 3.87x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.52x 16.89x $33B $6.1B AMZNAmazon.com3.87x 48.16x $158.9B $15.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or JD?
JD.com has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 4.51%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat JD.com's return on equity of 11.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $2.53 $179.7B JDJD.com17.3% $1.08 $51.4B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $121.05, signalling upside risk potential of 47.12%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $48.83 which suggests that it could grow by 37.01%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than JD.com, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than JD.com.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding28 8 0 JDJD.com28 4 0 -
Is BABA or JD More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.621%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. JD.com offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $36.4B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than JD.com's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while JD.com's PE ratio is 11.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.52x versus 0.36x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.52x 16.89x $33B $6.1B JDJD.com0.36x 11.32x $36.4B $1.6B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or NIO?
NIO has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of -27.53%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $2.53 $179.7B NIONIO10.75% -$0.35 $5.4B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or NIO?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $121.05, signalling upside risk potential of 47.12%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 39.31%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than NIO.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding28 8 0 NIONIO14 8 0 -
Is BABA or NIO More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or NIO?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or NIO?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.52x versus 1.02x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.52x 16.89x $33B $6.1B NIONIO1.02x -- $2.6B -$718.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or PDD?
PDD Holdings has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 25.14%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 48.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $2.53 $179.7B PDDPDD Holdings60.03% $2.36 $40.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or PDD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $121.05, signalling upside risk potential of 47.12%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $149.72 which suggests that it could grow by 50.36%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding28 8 0 PDDPDD Holdings31 7 0 -
Is BABA or PDD More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.73%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or PDD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or PDD?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $13.9B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than PDD Holdings's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.52x versus 2.83x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.52x 16.89x $33B $6.1B PDDPDD Holdings2.83x 9.75x $13.9B $3.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or TSLA?
Tesla has a net margin of 18.62% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 8.61%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding39.1% $2.53 $179.7B TSLATesla19.84% $0.62 $78.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $121.05, signalling upside risk potential of 47.12%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Tesla.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding28 8 0 TSLATesla13 15 8 -
Is BABA or TSLA More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.303, which suggesting that the stock is 69.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $33B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.89x while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.52x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.52x 16.89x $33B $6.1B TSLATesla15.13x 115.36x $25.2B $2.2B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
