PDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alibaba Group Holding has a net margin of 25.14% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of 18.62%. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 48.98% beat Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 7.78%.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $149.72, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Alibaba Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of $121.05 which suggests that it could grow by 47.12%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.303, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.67%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alibaba Group Holding offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding pays out 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.9B, which are smaller than Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues of $33B. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.5B is lower than Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.1B. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while Alibaba Group Holding's PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 2.83x versus 1.52x for Alibaba Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carbon Revolution PLC has a net margin of 25.14% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of --. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 48.98% beat Carbon Revolution PLC's return on equity of --.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $149.72, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Carbon Revolution PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1419.93%. Given that Carbon Revolution PLC has higher upside potential than PDD Holdings, analysts believe Carbon Revolution PLC is more attractive than PDD Holdings.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carbon Revolution PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carbon Revolution PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carbon Revolution PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.9B, which are larger than Carbon Revolution PLC quarterly revenues of --. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.5B is higher than Carbon Revolution PLC's net income of --. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while Carbon Revolution PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 2.83x versus -- for Carbon Revolution PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JD.com has a net margin of 25.14% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of 4.51%. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 48.98% beat JD.com's return on equity of 11.87%.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $149.72, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $48.83 which suggests that it could grow by 37.01%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than JD.com, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than JD.com.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.621%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.9B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $36.4B. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.5B is higher than JD.com's net income of $1.6B. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while JD.com's PE ratio is 11.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 2.83x versus 0.36x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto has a net margin of 25.14% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of 6.56%. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 48.98% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 16.5%.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $149.72, signalling upside risk potential of 50.36%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $29.96 which suggests that it could grow by 27.14%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than Li Auto.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.663, which suggesting that the stock is 33.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.9B, which are larger than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6B. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.5B is higher than Li Auto's net income of $393.1M. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.75x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 2.83x versus 1.27x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.