AMZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Home Depot has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 7.55%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat The Home Depot's return on equity of 375.6%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.92, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand The Home Depot has an analysts' consensus of $431.96 which suggests that it could grow by 23.01%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than The Home Depot, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than The Home Depot.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Home Depot has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.643%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Home Depot offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.30 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than The Home Depot quarterly revenues of $39.7B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than The Home Depot's net income of $3B. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.48x while The Home Depot's PE ratio is 23.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.30x versus 2.19x for The Home Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of -42.85%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.92, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26.44%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.48x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.30x versus 2.36x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 8.31%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.92, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $107.51 which suggests that it could grow by 10.75%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Starbucks.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.692%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Starbucks's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.48x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 31.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.30x versus 3.05x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 9.17%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.92, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $335.61 which suggests that it could grow by 36.14%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.48x while Tesla's PE ratio is 121.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.30x versus 8.90x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.