LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 1.93%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $376.82, signalling downside risk potential of -2.3%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $11.91 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.313%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 5.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $46.2B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $892M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.74x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 15.98%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Summit Networks's return on equity of -40.17%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $376.82, signalling downside risk potential of -2.3%. On the other hand Summit Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Summit Networks.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks has a beta of 7.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 635.095%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Summit Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Summit Networks quarterly revenues of -$73.9K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Summit Networks's net income of -$11.8K. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Summit Networks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.74x versus -- for Summit Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 9.57%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 53.26%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $376.82, signalling downside risk potential of -2.3%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $438.31 which suggests that it could grow by 0.69%. Given that Ulta Beauty has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Ulta Beauty is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.496%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Ulta Beauty's net income of $242.2M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.74x versus 1.84x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 14.68% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -285.43%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.4% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -154.61%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $376.82, signalling downside risk potential of -2.3%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18044.37%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 23.013% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $777.7K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $351.9M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 4.74x versus 0.06x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.