EFSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 35.91% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 20.42%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.08%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.63%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $48.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 16.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 3.38x versus 2.81x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Commerce has a net margin of 35.91% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 21.74%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Heritage Commerce's return on equity of 5.95%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.08%. On the other hand Heritage Commerce has an analysts' consensus of $11.58 which suggests that it could grow by 36.6%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Heritage Commerce, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Heritage Commerce.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Commerce has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.686%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Heritage Commerce offers a yield of 6.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Commerce pays out 78.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Heritage Commerce quarterly revenues of $48.9M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $48.8M is higher than Heritage Commerce's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Heritage Commerce's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 3.38x versus 3.03x for Heritage Commerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 35.91% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 28.72%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.08%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.12%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than Park National.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Park National offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $48.8M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Park National's PE ratio is 15.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 3.38x versus 4.45x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1st Source has a net margin of 35.91% compared to Enterprise Financial Services's net margin of 32.13%. Enterprise Financial Services's return on equity of 10.46% beat 1st Source's return on equity of 11.8%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.08%. On the other hand 1st Source has an analysts' consensus of $68.17 which suggests that it could grow by 24.8%. Given that Enterprise Financial Services has higher upside potential than 1st Source, analysts believe Enterprise Financial Services is more attractive than 1st Source.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.839, which suggesting that the stock is 16.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1st Source has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33%.

Enterprise Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. 1st Source offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Enterprise Financial Services pays 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. 1st Source pays out 26.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Financial Services quarterly revenues are $136M, which are larger than 1st Source quarterly revenues of $97.8M. Enterprise Financial Services's net income of $48.8M is higher than 1st Source's net income of $31.4M. Notably, Enterprise Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while 1st Source's PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enterprise Financial Services is 3.38x versus 3.46x for 1st Source. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.