PRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 28.72% compared to Park National's net margin of -9.18%. Park National's return on equity of 12.67% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -5.67%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $177.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Park National has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.547%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $134.5M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Park National's net income of $38.6M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of -$2M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 4.80x versus 1.94x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 28.72% compared to Park National's net margin of 20.42%. Park National's return on equity of 12.67% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $177.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 29.3%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.735%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $134.5M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Park National's net income of $38.6M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 4.80x versus 3.10x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 28.72% compared to Park National's net margin of 38.34%. Park National's return on equity of 12.67% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.06%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $177.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.194%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $134.5M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Park National's net income of $38.6M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $4M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 4.80x versus 1.10x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 28.72% compared to Park National's net margin of 25.81%. Park National's return on equity of 12.67% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $177.83, signalling upside risk potential of 15.6%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.68%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.136%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $134.5M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. Park National's net income of $38.6M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 4.80x versus 3.09x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.